Tuesday, February 2, 2010

9 out of 10 Climbers Make the Same Mistakes; The M&W Review

9 out of 10 Climbers Make the Same Mistakes
Dave MacLeod, Rare Breed Productions, 2010

Available at Amazon.com

There are a lot of climbing books out there these days that offer to help climbers improve and raise their abilities. In recent years, the sophistication of these has risen considerably. The gold standard remains, in my mind, Performance Rock Climbing by Dale Goddard and Udo Neumann but a number of other important volumes have appeared including those by Eric Hörst and the Self-Coached Climber by Dan Hague and Doug Hunter.

Now a new entrant to this crowded field has appeared, an unlikely-appearing contender for the best in its field. It is slim, has no color illustrations or accompanying DVD, in fact no illustrations at all save an unhappy over-muscled gorilla on the front cover. It contains no chart-laden prescriptions for training cycles, hangboard workouts, or other programs. Furthermore, it assumes that the reader, like the gorilla on the cover, has got issues. In other words it is not a relentlessly positive upbeat kind of book, such as most American productions tend to be.

Yet as I say, this may be the best training book out there for a certain kind of climber, the climber for whom the positive attitude and encouraging words of the other books are no longer working. They have done the training programs, followed the routines, visualized the heck out the routes and are still stuck in the rut. MacLeod’s book is a healthy reminder how hard climbing can be and how it is to work out of a plateau. The book comes with a kind of warning at the very beginning: “This book is for anyone ready to challenge and change their climbing habits.” This book is not for the beginner. Indeed a beginner will not understand the world it describes, a world of struggling with frustration on routes or problems that should present no difficulty thanks to years of experience and training. The climber who needs this book is the one who gets aggravated because “5.12 should be easy by now” or “Anyone can climb 5.13 these days, why can’t I?”

For me, who has lived in this world on and off for years, owing to life changes, injury, etc, MacLeod’s book is a refreshing back-to-basics approach that emphasizes reality over wishful thinking. He reminds the reader that the natural tendency for climbers is to seek a comfort zone and call that success. However comfort turns into a trap owing to the simple reality that climbing is hard and hard climbing is really hard. MacLeod seeks to remind the climber about how many subtle or underrated factors can direct climbers away from the path of actual improvement and toward stagnation and frustration.

So what are the concrete ideas or practices that MacLeod proposes? Early on he offers the thought that climbers are afraid of change more than anything else since change implies a risk of failure. Failure for many climbers is both personal and public, at least in their minds, and the sense of self-worth that climbing gives has an ugly side when climbing fails to deliver it. As MacLeod rightly points out, they will compensate by working on what they know they will succeed at, which is typically strength training or a single type of climbing or even hold. For example, I know that I prefer climbing on small crimps in a quiet, relatively cool place. But, sometimes, I know I have to climb at the Spot on slippery blobby pinches in the heat and fail on 4 spots in front of a crowd. It’s frustrating but there it is. MacLeod himself recommends the same thing as it keeps him honest about how he’s doing. He sums it up by adding, “Sticking with what’s comfortable isn’t a slow steady way to improve. It’s a slippery slope that starts off too shallow to notice but steepens alarmingly down the line.”

Macleod argues that technique is at the heart of climbing well which of course everyone claims to know already. But do they really? MacLeod’s analytical approach turns the screws a little tighter. Ask yourself, he says, how much time you actually climb in a given training session. Maybe 30 minutes out of two or three hours? What are you doing in the meantime? If you aren’t focusing on remembering what worked, what didn’t, and thinking about why, you have cut the time value of the session by half or more by not learning from it when the experience is freshest. The same theme is encountered in his discussion of doing climbing drills. If you are not consciously developing skills by lower intensity climbing movements done really well, you are missing a great opportunity to focus on improvement instead of staving off failure. Throughout the book this theme of extracting value and efficiency provides a foundation for clarity on thinking about how to improve.

And really the rest of the book goes on in this vein. It is so concise, so direct, and so rich in terms of advice that this review could go on for pages, picking only highlights. If there is a quibble I have it might be the lack of illustrations which in a few instances could clarify points the author is making. However since this is aimed at the experienced climber, most of us can visualize what he is getting at pretty easily. Part 3, about falling, I am somewhat ambivalent about. I agree that removing the fear of falling is a vitally needed skill. However I am not sure whether the analogy of climbing being safer than driving is quite accurate. In other words, even in really safe settings, a mismanaged fall, whether bouldering or sport climbing, can have quite bad consequences, even when the situation was thought to be under control. I can’t count the number of friends who have badly injured themselves like this. It takes a long time to get back the confidence lost after an injurious fall. Curiously, the idea of wearing a helmet is not mentioned, even for trad falls. So tread warily but confidently out there unless you know for sure what you’re about.

Overall, I would unhesitatingly recommend this book. The insight the author gives into the world of high-end climbing is invaluable and his candid, thoughtful, and clear prose conveys advice in a way that is likely to be heeded. If you have been there, frustrated and at a plateau and haven’t really thought out why, buying this book would be a good first step towards getting out of the rut. 9 out of 10? More like 10 out of 10.

I should add that Dave's Online Climbing Coach blog is invaluable as a resource for more information and ideas.

11 comments:

Jordan said...

Great post. Can't wait to read this book.

Odub said...

Agreed, Peter. I recently bought the book and have greatly enjoyed it. While it was more of a confirmation that I was already doing the right things in my training, I learned some invaluable lessons about how to assess myself. Great book from a fresh perspective.

Anonymous said...

nice review, though i slightly disagree on two points

a) in retrospective it would have been very useful even when i was an "advanced beginner", maybe as a complement to a more classic self-coaching manual.

b)in the fear of falling chapter, my understanding is that it suggest taking away the irrational fear, but keeping the rational judgement about what's safe and what's not.
The message is not to intentionally take 50 footers on marginal gear with the rope behind your leg...

Peter Beal said...

I agree that the goal is to remove irrational fear. The problem is that it can be difficult to know 100% for sure that falling will be safe. I have had fairly terrifying falls inside and outside that I thought would be safe.

For another perspective, read this article.

Anonymous said...

i enjoyed the book also. read it through the first night, methinks.

the weight issue is a biggie, and something he went into a litte bit. i think he talked about body fat %, and it was refreshing to read about it this way: be scientific about weight-loss. know that the human body needs about 3% body fat, and anything above is stored as superfluous sub-dermal fat. in other words, lose it!

chuffer said...

The fact that you agree that 'Performance Rock Climbing' is "the gold standard" goes a long way towards making me believe that this book is worth checking out.

From what you've written, it sounds as if this book is for a certain type of long-term climber, one who has been around the block and is familiar with the habits and the personal dramas that invades our little heads to mindf@ck us in so many ways and keep us from performing at that "next level." The utility of the important messages in 'PRC' and Horst's books like 'Flash Training' and 'How to Climb 5.12' are certainly watered down and diminished by these habits and dramas '9 Out of 10 Climbers Make the Same Mistakes' sounds as if it makes strides in this arena via a completely different spin to help those that are motivated get the most out of our bodies and minds.

Look forward to checking this book out ... Thanks for this!

Peter Beal said...

"the weight issue is a biggie, and something he went into a litte bit. i think he talked about body fat %, and it was refreshing to read about it this way: be scientific about weight-loss. know that the human body needs about 3% body fat, and anything above is stored as superfluous sub-dermal fat. in other words, lose it!"

I passed over this section in part due to space reasons as well the feeling that readers can think about it on their own. MacLeod's view is that for the most part weight should not be a major issue. Focusing on losing weight is a very dangerous path to follow as it can lead and does lead to eating disorders. 3% is a number regarded as "essential" and is not a good guide for an athlete who does not undertake "normal" physiological function.

In One Move Too Many, the authors cite a 1999 study that "body fat below 6% for men and 10% for women does not significantly improve performance."(190) They go on to say "Without that fat you are starving your muscles and connective tissues of water and their necessary nutrition."

Personally, I feel that it is easier and healthier to "lose" a few pounds by doing the move better, using momentum and better footwork, and getting stronger fingers, etc than obsessing about calories. Eat sensibly and have a generally healthy lifestyle and that should be sufficient. Being thin is not the aim, climbing well in way that helps you live better is.

Anonymous said...

"Focusing on losing weight is a very dangerous path to follow as it can lead and does lead to eating disorders. 3% is a number regarded as "essential" and is not a good guide for an athlete who does not undertake "normal" physiological function."

maybe i was misunderstood: i certainly didn't endorse a 3% level! let the marathoners live in that range (which they do!); i think like you mention, around 6% might be the lowest a climber would get to (although it'd be interesting to know adam ondra's %, or usobiaga's).
my point (and dave's) is that hauling around extra weight can be a deal breaker. a 150 pounder going from 12% to 6% would lose close to 15 pounds! try climbing a 5.14 or a V12 with 15 pounds strapped to your butt.
i would even suggest that 5.14 hasn't been climbed by anyone over 10% body fat....

but anyway, i agree with you that the book was excellent, and I'd certainly recommend it to anyone who's serious about improving.

Peter Beal said...

For sure excess weight is undesirable in climbing. However MacLeod cites John Dunne (and I'm sure there are others) whose physique is not thin and has achieved 5.14. The odds are against more than a minority reaching this level but since climbing is a technique oriented sport with a lot of weight borne by the legs and feet, weight by itself is not a determining factor. Remember that long ago 5.13 was a goal seen as worth starving for. Seriously.

Thanks for the follow-up Anon 2

Anonymous said...

"However MacLeod cites John Dunne (and I'm sure there are others) whose physique is not thin and has achieved 5.14."

dunne has been perceived as a bit of an enigma certainly, but reality might be a bit different than myth: macleod mentions that there are rumors about dunne losing 30 to 40 pounds before sends. true or not, i don't know, but this perhaps adds context to dunne the enigma.

Anonymous said...

Ya, regarding Dunne, the author notes that Dunne was an early adopter of periodization...